Monday, January 16, 2012

The Triangle

For any beginner with DSLR, the first book that will be recommended to go through before trying their hands on manual mode is Understanding Exposure by Bryan Peterson. This is one book that has never been easy for me to borrow from the library, since the "on hold" due has always been pretty long.  But definitely worth the wait. I happened to read it for the second time recently and this post is on the words ( or close to) of the author of this book.

Shutter Speed, Exposure and ISO are the three key concepts that needs thorough understanding before one starts exploring and experimenting in manual mode. So those three put together is called "The Photographic Triangle" and the heart of the triangle is Light metering. I have always written about these three concepts a lot earlier, but they have never been combined back-to-back to make a lot of sense. So doing it here.

ISO: Ranges from 100 to 3600 or beyond. Setting the ISO to bigger numbers allows more light into the camera, making pictures brighter even with limited lighting. Say for example, inside the house/building, where the light is very low, popping ISO to 200 or 400 adds sense to taking indoor pictures, which might otherwise turn out underexposed.

But it has its cons, the grains. Bigger ISOs brings noise to the picture making it look grainy. Well, that is not a problem these days, since with a lot of ready-to-download free softwares like Noiseware, it doesnt take more than a couple of minutes to fix the noise and making the picture noise-free  and smooth.

Exposure: It is the f stop number. It is all about how big is the lens opening to capture the details of the picture. The bigger aperture (smaller f number), it takes in every detail of a smaller area and the remaining (what we call here as background) becomes all blurry giving a beautiful bokeh. Same way, the smaller aperture (bigger f number), it takes in all the details - from the back to the front making it a no bokeh, all intact shot.

Exposure allows room for the concept depth of field or shallow depth of field. Any F stop that covers all the details in the shot from back ground to foreground has got a good DOF, and anything the makes the foreground - subject stand out from the background makes a shallow DOF.

Also, exposure determines the shape of the bokeh. Say for example a smaller f stop gives perfect circle bokehs ( shape of the lens as such), and anywhere inbetween like f 8 to f 11 gives hexagonal bokehs and anything beyond that doesnt render much bokeh in general.

Shutter Speed: This determines how long the shutter of the lens remains opened and thus says how much light gets in depending on the external light situation. The longer the shutter is opened more light enters and vice verse.

So going by common sense, during low light situations we keep the shutter open for longer time (like 30 seconds exposure or 10 seconds exposure) to allow in more light and during a bright sunny day the shutter speed is high to allow minimal light just enough to light the scene/shot.

After setting the ISO and aperture, adjusting the shutter speed back and forth while holding the click button half way down, the camera usually tells which is the right shutter speed for this kind of specific setting. But as always, there is this concept called "creatively right" shutter speed which might not have to be the right shutter speed suggested by the camera. That is when the room for creativity is squeezed out.

And the heart of the triangle is the "light metering" which is definitely very vast to write in this post.

I would again suggest any newbie to photography who is truly interested to go through this above book atleast once. It definitely throws light on the abcs of the photography with a very simple language and doesnt confuse with fancy terms at all. 

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Black and White Vs Grayscale

Black and White and Grayscale conversion are two entirely different concepts, often confused since there is a very thin line segregating the both.

I have been waiting to try my hands on Black and White and have never been happy with the grayscale conversion that Picasa or Picnik or anyother free photo-editing software that is available offers.

Blindly converting it to the so called "black and white" takes away the life of the otherwise beautiful picture when not done prepoerly. Black and White conversion is supposed to add more life or more drama to the scene and should not be taking out the life of the picture.

All the black and white conversion I have done in the past looked either muddy or flat, or too gray or too bland.

And now, by that I dont claim that I have done a great job with this bunch of b&w conversions (disclaimer) and I bet I will come up with better conversions again in another 2 months with the same set of pictures since I am still learning going by the example-  the pictures that I edit this week looks better than the ones that I edited last week.

The basics to get a better b&w shots are:

* Never shoot in B&W mode that is available in the camera settings. Converting them to b&w later is a lot simple than regretting to have taken the shot in color.

* High contrast shots are great for this.

* Lighting could possibly add some drama to the scene.

* Shoot at the lowest ISO

* Like it is always said, shoot in RAW. It works like a charm when taken for editing.

A few B&W conversions that I attempted:







THe order is Original- "do it all for me" conversion, and the "attempted" b&w conversion. I like the drama of over-exposed sky and the sail against the gray water than the overall gray scale found in the second picture.

The following one is definitely going to be easy on the eyes. In the order Original - auto conversion - manual conversion.




With a tight crop to compose the picture + tad bit of increasing the contrast + brightness to B&W pop up worked better than the all auto B&W conversion.  This above formula is very much possible with picnic or picasa too. Just that there is also the "auto b&w" option readily available and more easily accessible just to pamper us.

A few more in the order auto - manual conversion:











And some conversions which were genuinely not attempted anywhere else, but waited and done manually :





On the very last picture, I cringe for not having taken the whole circle and for having chopped off the top and bottom of it. Sigh!

Most of the pictures were taken in RAW (except for 1) and the conversions that I have done with PSE is very much possible to do with Picasa or Picnic too.  It is all about putting the "contrast" to work to pull out a bit of drama into the scene.